As a Dedicated Capitalist, But Universal Medicare Represents the Top Solution for American Health System
Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.
Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.
The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive
According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.
Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.
When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.
The Way Universal Coverage Would Work
A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.
Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average American pays. I know dozens of clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.
Implementation in the US
In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.
Benefits for Small Businesses
Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).
It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for weighing risks and different options.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.
Addressing Concerns
Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.
Need for Honest Assessment
As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.