🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."